Text, Photos and Analysis by Michael Ferrara Dyno & Measurements by Jeren Walker, Data Crunching Vinh Nguyen
DSPORT Issue #129
The Wild WestThere was a time when the driver was in total control of the vehicle. The driver’s left foot actuated a mechanical linkage or cable that opened the throttle body without debate. The driver’s right foot established the pressure in the braking system. Again, there was no deliberation whether too much pressure was being generated. Hence, the brakes could even be locked up with too much pedal effort. Keeping the vehicle stable was the job of the driver, not a subroutine in a computer program. Driver’s took control of a vehicle and weren’t merely along for the ride.
Limited GovernmentThere are advantages to having the ECU deliver a limited degree of government. The current iteration of ABS systems eliminates dangerous lock- ups without sacrificing overall braking performance. Vehicle stability systems that have selectable modes (including a fully-off mode) are also beneficial and welcomed additions to vehicles. With the advent of faster UEGO sensors, closed-loop oxygen sensor feedback under all engine conditions helps to increase overall engine reliability. These are some great arguments for limited government. No sane performance enthusiast professes anarchy, but a limited role in what the ECU can and can’t do is ideal.
Big GovernmentThere was a time when an ECU simply looked at the load on the engine and its RPM to determine the proper amount of fuel delivery and spark timing. Now the ECU has control of the throttle (on drive by wire engines) and a host of “limit” or “threshold” maps that can sometimes ensure that only limited gains can be made with bolt-on components. With control of the throttle, the driver no longer has direct control of the torque output from the engine. Instead, the ECU determines if it wants to do what the driver is now “asking” it to do with the gas pedal input. On a positive note, drive-by-wire throttle control gives the ECU the opportunity to implement effective traction control and vehicle stability strategies. Unfortunately, it also allows the OEM to calibrate the ECU to limit throttle delivery based on whatever the OEM desires. Currently, a number of ECUs have threshold or limit maps in the factory programming. This allows the OEM to limit the engine from producing additional power, if the OEM so desires. In the simplest example, the OEM can implement a special table that causes the throttle to be closed if air flow meter readings are larger than expected for a given engine speed. Hence those intake systems, exhaust systems, headers, camshafts and other items that actually increase airflow through the engine can be spoiled by the ECU closing the throttle because it’s programmed to allow only so much airflow (power) to be made.
The 5-Percent RuleBecause the ECU in the Scion FR-S has tables built in that essentially limit the amount of additional power that can be made, dyno testing bolt-on products on the vehicle proved extremely challenging. Based on over 250 dyno runs that we conducted, we found that the ECU seems to only allow performance gains on the order of about 5.0 percent. Adding the additional components to allow more additional power production with the factory-programmed ECU still only delivers that 5.0 percent gain.
1+1 = 1Let’s say that you have an intake that adds about 5.0-percent more power when installed on a stock vehicle. Now, let’s say you have an exhaust system that adds about 5.0 percent of power on a stock vehicle. While you shouldn’t expect to get a 10.0-pecent gain from the two, it’s realistic to expect to see a performance gain with both items in the realm of 6.0- to-9.0 percent. Yet, the factory- programmed Scion FR-S ECU says 1+1 = 1. We confirmed the severity of the 5.0-percent rule when we found that the Scion FR-S simply didn’t gain any additional power when an aftermarket exhaust was added after the addition of an aftermarket intake system. On DSPORT’s DynoJet 424xLC Linx dyno, the number that could never be exceeded was about 182 wheel horsepower. Stock horsepower figures checked in between 173 and 176 horsepower when tested on different days.
FR-S OEM Air Filter Intake System
QUICK FACTS Positive + Quietest of all systems tested + Highest average horsepower in 2,500 to 3,000 RPM range + A/F Ratios are OEM’s desired values + Does not attract attention during “pop-your-hood” law enforcement encounters Negatives – Factory filter element chokes off a couple ponies – Power not optimized in the 3,500~6,000 RPM range – Looks stock…No BlingOverview: The factory intake system is actually extremely well designed. The air box minimizes heat soak from the engine bay while a front facing inlet supplies cold air from behind the headlight. Acoustics are well engineered to provide an intake growl only under full-throttle conditions. Analysis: The factory filter element is the weakest link in the factory system. An upgrade to a high-performance element should show measurable gains.
Average Horsepower (3 Runs) + Average Air Fuel Ratio
Dyno Test Procedure• Check and set air pressure in tires before dyno session • Keep hood in closed position for tests • Complete all test pulls in same day • Reset ECU (Disconnect battery) during each install • Start pull with engine temp @ 165~170 degrees Fahrenheit • Start pull with intake air temp @ 78~85 degrees Fahrenheit • 4th Gear Pull (Pull time approximately 15 seconds) • Start sample from 1,800 RPM to rev-limiter (6,400 RPM) • Keep vehicle strapped to dyno through all pulls and installs
• Part One Intro • Intake Showcase (Part One)… AEM ETI INTAKE SYSTEM, BLITZ ADVANCED POWER AIR, HKS PREMIUM SUCTION, INJEN SP SERIES, K&N 69-SERIES TYPHOON, TAKEDA MOMENTUM, TRD PERFORMANCE AIR INTAKE, WEAPON-R SECRET WEAPON, APEXI POWER INTAKE FILTER, AVO TURBO WORLD SILICONE INLET COMBO PIPE, BLITZ SUS POWER FILTER LM, K&N REPLACEMENT AIR FILTER • Part One Conclusion 2) Ecutek FR-S | Reprogramming the Power-Limiting Factory ECU 3) Scion FR-S/BRZ Intake Test: Pt 2 (EcuTek ECU) • Part Two Intro • Intake Showcase (Part Two)… AEM ETI INTAKE SYSTEM, BLITZ ADVANCED POWER AIR, HKS PREMIUM SUCTION, INJEN SP SERIES, K&N 69-SERIES TYPHOON, TAKEDA MOMENTUM, TRD PERFORMANCE AIR INTAKE, WEAPON-R SECRET WEAPON • Part Two Conclusion